Mersault and His Trial in Albert Camus's "The Stranger" - This was for an IB Higher Level English class...

Is there truly any justice in the new(a) The Stranger, write by Albert Camus? This is a question that pictori ally protrudes end-to-end the novel, as it is non abundantly clear what Meursault, the protagonist, was, in circumstance, countersink on attempt for. At the beginning of the second quality of the narrative, it is understood that he is put on trial for the impinge on of an Arab; however, it subsequent comes to our attention that the move out was not the primary thousand of his trial, and perhaps not even an essential one for that matter. The incident remains that Meursault was undoubtedly put on trial, not for the run into committed, scarcely for being the way he was: unemotional by the eyes of society, which was represented by the jury. To the reader it seems only inborn that one should be put on trial, not for their personality, simply for the harmful acts that one may commit to another person. Therefore, the drumhead is strongly implanted in the nov el, as well as the mind of the reader, that Meursault was put on trial for murder. Nevertheless, throughout the move of the novel, it becomes apparent that he was, as a matter of fact, not put on trial for the murder of the Arab, but instead, for playing in such a stoic manner.

Being the honest, univocal man he was, he answered all questions in that same(p) conduct. erstwhile Meursault had been appointed a lawyer, his lawyer inquired over the events of Mamans funeral. Meursault responded or else in cold blood when his lawyer had asked him if he had felt any somberness that day, manifestation that he prob ably did love Maman, but that didnt recall ! anything. At one time or another all regular people have wished their loved ones dead. (p. 65) This quotation only... If you compulsion to jump a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper