.

Wednesday, February 6, 2019

No Harm Can Come to a Good Man Essay -- Philosophy Religion Essays

No Harm preempt Come to a Good Man Whether Socrates is portrayed correctly or not, he certainly was a great man. His contribution to western thinking cannot be denied. For even if his teachings were different from what they are known to be at present, his influence on Plato is immense. And so, it is no small matter to describe the tragical passing of such a man as Socrates was and remains for ism today. Yet in all the indignation which is expected to arise at the death of Socrates, the panache with which he departs is captured excellently in Platos Apology. Specifically, at the block of the Apology, Socrates organizes a very important dictation that has had great impact on philosophy ever since its original proclamation. The Stoics in particular declare interpreted this to be the cornerst unrivalled of their ideology. The statement made is that you must regard one thing at least as certainthat no defile can come to a good man either in his life or after his death, (Plat o 100). The following examination focuses therefore on a brief explanation of the circumstances which lead to this statement creation made by Socrates, as well as a close look at why he thinks this to be the case. It is assumed that this statement is true, and validation for that assumption is to be sought as well.So, first, why does Socrates make such a bold statement? Verily it is nothing on the spur of the moment of his own death sentence. The people who accused and voted against Socrates, have decreed it that he is to die for impiety toward the gods and of corrupting the youth (Plato), in addition, it is known that Socrates has as a companion of sorts a prophetic voice to keep his philosophical endeavors regulated. Socrates himself states that this presence has not opposed him at an... ... is safely sustained. Ultimately, the lack of intimacy on the subject of death is no grounds for its presumption to have any negative connotation. Thus Socrates leaves the people and th e men of the jury, pronouncing that it is time for us to gome to my death, you to your lives. Which of us goes to the better fate, only god knows, (Plato 100).Works Cited Aurelius, Marcus. Meditations. antiquated Philosophy. 3rd Ed. philosophic Classics, vols. 1. Baird, Forrest E., and Walter Kaufman. Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall, 2000.Epictetus. Encheiridion. Ancient Philosophy. 31 Ed. Philosophic Classics, vols. 1. Baird, Forrest E., and Walter Kaufman. Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall, 2000.Plato. Apology. Ancient Philosophy. 3rd Ed. Philosophic Classics, vols. 1. Baird, Forrest E., and Walter Kaufman. Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall, 2000. 82-100.

No comments:

Post a Comment